Articulators
DEFINATION: A Mechanical device that represents the temperomandibular joints and jaw members to which maxillary and mandibular casts may be attached to stimulate some or all of the mandibular movements.
PURPOSES
1. To hold the maxillary and mandibular casts in a determined fixed relationship.
2. Mounting of dental casts for diagnosis treatment planning and patient presentation.
3.To simulate the jaw movement like opening and closing.
4. Fabrication of occlusal surfaces for dental restoration.
5. Arrangement of artificial teeth for complete and removable partial denture.
USE
1. To diagnose the state of occlusion in both the natural and artificial dentition
2. To plan the dental procedures based on the relationship between opposing natural and
artificial teeth.
Ex. Evaluation of the possibility of balance occlusion.
- o 4.To aid in the fabrication of restorations and prosthodontics replacements.
- o 5.To correct and modified complete restorations.
- o 6.To arrange artificial teeth.
REQUIREMENTS
Two Types of Requirements
a. Minimal requirements
b. Additional requirements
Minimal requirements
They are necessory for the fabrication of complete denture to the patients centric position.
They are –
1. It must be accurately maintain the correct horizontal and vertical relationship of the patient’s casts.
2. The casts should be easily removable and attachable to the articulator without loosing their correct horizontal and vertical relationship
3. The articulator should have an incisal guide pin with a positive stop, that is adjustable and caliberated.
4. The articulator should be able to open and closed in a hinge like fashion.
5. The articulator should accept a face-bow transfer utilizing an anterior reference point.
6. The construction should be accurate, rigid and of non corrosive material.
7. The moving parts should move freely without any friction.
8. The non moving parts should be of a rigid construction.
9. The design should be such that there is adequate distance between the upper and lower members.
10. The articulator should be stable on the laboratory bench and not too bulky and heavy.
CLASSIFICATION OF ARTICULATORS
Several basis of classification of articulator were proposed, some of them are as follows.
1. Based on the instruments function
2. Based on theories of occlusion
3. Based on the type of inter occlusal record used
4. Based on the adjustabililty of the articulator.
1. Based on the instruments function
At the international prosthodontic workshop on complete denture occlusion at the university of Michigan in 1972, the articulators classified based on instrument capability, intent, recording procedure and record acceptance
Class I : Hinge Type
Class II : Arbitrary – type A
type B
type C
Class III : Average -type A
type B
1.These are simple articulator (Simple holding instruments) capable of accepting a single static registration.
2. Only Vertical motion possible.
3.Important features are positive stops and locks at the mounted position
4.Use in cases where a tentative jaw relation is done.
5.Class I instruments are suitable for crown and bridge, and operative instruments.
Subdivision A: vertical motion is possible. Ex: Corelator, Venticulator.
Subdivision B: vertical motion is joint related. Ex: Centric Relator
Examples of Class I :- Slab articulator
Hinge joint articulator – J.B. GARIOT (1805)
Barn door articulator
Gysi Simplex (Alfred Gysi, Zurich, 1914)
CLASS II (Arbitary)
These articulator permits horizontal and vertical movements but they do not orient the movement to TMJ with a face-bow.
They are –
1. TYPE A :-
Eccentric motion is unrelated to patient motion.
Permit limited eccentric motion based on averages.
Do not permit face-bow transfer.
The condyles are on the lower member of articulator.
( Based on Bonwill’s triangle)
Ex. Mean-Value articulator - GYSI
2. TYPE B :-
Permit limited eccentric motion based on arbitrary theory of motion .
.
Ex. A. Monson’s articulator / Spherical Theory Articulator – Fournet &
Hageman articulators
B. Hall’s articulator / Conical Theory Articulator ( Shofu Handy II )
3. TYPE C :-
Permit limited eccentric motion based on engraved records obtained from the patient.
Do not accept a face-bow transfer.
Ex.:- House’s articulator (1920)
Gnathic Relator
CLASS III (Average)
1. They permit horizontal and vertical motion
2. Do accept face-bow transfer but these facility is limited.
3. Do Not / Cannot allow total customization of condylar pathways.
4. They simulate condylar pathways by using average or mechanical equivalents for the whole or part of the condylar motion.
5. They allow for joint orientation of the casts and may be arcon or nonarcon instruments. All the examples are arcon instruments, accept facebows, and have mounting plates for unlimited case load.
6.These instruments can fulfill the requirements for complete denture construction.
7.Desirable features would be good centric lock, progressive and immediate side shift controls,protrusive inclination, intercenter distance adjustment, a simple mounting procedure, a good sturdy design, and an arcon arrangement
They are – Type A
Type B
1. TYPE A :-
Accept static protrusive interocclusal records / registrations + Accepts a face-bow
transfer
Uses equivalents for other types of motions.
Exp. Hanau H articulator ( RUDOLPH HANAU , 1923) NON-ARCON
Hanau H2 articulator – NON ARCON
Bergstrom articulator (ARCON) Dentatus (1944, Sweden)
2. TYPE B :-
Accept a Static Lateral protrusive interocclusal records + face-bow transfer
Use equivalents for other types of motions
Exp. Trubyte articulator - (GYSI, 1926) – NON ARCON
Tripod articulator - STANSBERRY
Ney articulator - (De Pietro , 1960) - ARCON
Hanau (130-21) - (Richard Beu & James Janik .1964)
Tele Dyne articulator - (Richard Beu ,1975) - ARCON
Pandent articulator - Robert Lee - ARCON
Denar Mark II
Whipmix
Case Articulator Simulator
TMJ Mechanical fossa Instrument
CLASS IV (Special)
1.These articulator accept three dimensional dynamic registration.
2.They are capable of accurately reproducing the condylar pathway for each patient.
3.They allow point (joint) orientation of the casts using Face Bow Transfer
4 .They allow for orientation of the cast to the temporomandibular joints and replication of all mandibular movements.
5.These articulators are the instruments of choice for complete reconstructions.
6. These instruments should hold adjustments, contain good centric locking mechanism, versatile incisal guide tables, and stable mounting features, and be precision engineered.
They are – Type A
Type B
1) TYPE A :-
Accept three dimensional dynamic registration + utilise a face-bow transfer.
Condylar pathways are formed by registration engraved by the patient.
This path is non - modifyable
Exp. TMJ articulator – Kenneth Swanson (1965) Stereograph
2) TYPE B :-
Accept three dimensional dynamic registration + utilise a face-bow transfer.
Condylar pathway can be selectively angled and customized / modified.
The procedure utilise the pantographic tracing.
EXP. Pantronic acticulator – Dener (1982)
Gnathoscope - Charls Stuart
Denar D 4A & D 5A - Niles Guichet, 1968
Denar Model SE
Simulator - Earnest Granger
• BASED ON THEORIES OF ARTICULATOR
Designed by WGA Bonwill (Bonwill , 1858 : father of anatomic/balanced occlusion,
equilateral triangle
"Allow lateral movement & permit movement in horizontal plane."
Always model the upper wax (record base) first, judging the length of incisors and trial placement of anterior teeth for shade, shape, length and width. To articulate the lower cast, use a pair of dividers four inches apart with the center of the lower teeth at the median line just four inches from the condyles on either side
Conical Theory Articulators
Designed b R.E. Hall (Hall, 1918 : adjustable 3D anatomic articulator; universal mandibular movements, adjustable incisal guide )
Lower teeth move over the surface of the upper teeth as over the surface of a cone generating an angle of 45 degree.
Designed by G. S. Monsoon (Monsoon, 1916 : Spherical theory of occlusion )
Lower teeth move over the surface of the upper teeth as over a surface of sphere with a diameter of 8inches.
The center was located in the region of glabella.
BASED TYPE OF INTEROCCLUSAL RECORDS USED:
BASED TYPE OF INTEROCCLUSAL RECORDS USED:
Eccentric pathways can be dynamically registered either graphically (pantographic method) or stereographically (engraving method), positionally registered (checkbite method), determined by the articulator (mechanical equivalents), or adjusted entirely on the patient.
BASED ON THE ADJUSTABILITY
Three Types :-
a. Non – Adjustable
b. Semi – Adjustable
c. Fully – Adjustable
NON – ADJUSTABLE A.
Can open and close in a fixed horizontal axis.
Have a fixed condylar path.
The incisal pins ride on an inclined plate in a fixed inclination.
Can accept one or two of the following records: Face bow, centric jaw relation or protrusive record.
A class I articulator is a nonadjustable articulator.
SEMI ADJUSTABLE A.
Have adjustable horizontal condylar paths, adjustable lateral condylar path adjustable incisal guide table and adjustable inter condylar distance.
The degree and ease of these adjustments differ.
Can accept all three of the following records: Face bow, centric jaw relation or protrusive record.
A class II or III articulator is a semiadjustable articulator.
Two Type:-
Arcon Type
Non arcon Type
1. ARCON Type
The term “Arcon” was derived by Bergstrom from the words Ar- Articulator & Con – Condyle
This articulator resembles the TMJ.
The Condylar Element / analogue / sphere àattached to – Lower Member (Movable)
The Condylar Guidance (~Glenoid Fossa) à attached to – Upper / Cranial Member (immovable)
Advantage: The Face Bow transfer, occlusal plane, and relationship of the opposing casts are preserved when the articulator is opened and closed.
Examples :- Whipmix , 8500 ( DR. Charles Stuart, 1963)
Hanau H@, Arcon
Dentatus, ARA
Ney articulator - (De Pietro , 1960)
Tele Dyne articulator - (Richard Beu ,1975)
2. Non-Arcon type
This articulator is the reverse of the TMJ
The Condylar Element / analogue / sphere àattached to – Upper Member (Movable)
The Condylar Guidance (~Glenoid Fossa) à attached to – Lower Member (immovable)
Examples:- Hanau , 96h20
Hanau, University
Gysi, adjustable
Trubyte articulator - (GYSI, 1926)
Dentatus, ARL
Hanau, Kinoscope
House, Rotary Grinder
FULLY ADJUSTABLE
Capable of being adjusted to follow the mandibular movement in all direction.
They have numerous adjustable readings which can be customized for each patient.
They donot have a condylar guidance instead they have receptacles, in which acrylic dough can be contoured to form a customized condylar & incisal guidance.
Can accept the following five records: Face bow, centric jaw relation, protrusive, lateral records, and intercondylar distance record.
They are not commonly used due to their complexity.
A class IV articulator is a fully adjustable articulator
Examples:- Pantronic acticulator – Dener (1982)
Gnathoscope - Charls Stuart
Denar D 4A & D 5A - Niles Guichet, 1968
Simulator (by Ernest Granger)
Gnatholator (by Granger)
BASIC COMPONENT OF AN ARTICULATOR
- o Upper member – Represent maxilla
- o Lower member – Represent mandible
- o CONDYLAR TRACK –
- o CONDYLAR ELEMENT-
- o Vertical Rod (Incisal Pin)
- o Incisal guide table
SOME COMMONALY USED ARTICULATOR
- o Mean-Value Articulator
- o Hanau wide VUE articulator
- o Whip – mix articulator
- o Denar articulator
- o Panadent articulator
- o TMJ articulator
CONCLUSION
An articulator is an important device that mechanical analogues the temporomandibular joint & upper and lower dental arches.
A device to which maxillary and mandibular casts can be attached,with the intent of simulating the functional & para functional contact relationships of one arch to the other.
can u send me about research articulator,,,,to more functional..plessss
ReplyDeleteCan you elaborate, as to what you need.
Delete